Skip to content
Question

Q.Abha had guests at home. She ordered vegetable, biryani from 'Biryani House'. The biryani came in a beautiful packaging and Abha opened it with lot of excitement. However, when she started serving biryani to the guests, she realised that it was non-vegetarian. She checked the package and noticed that there was no indication whether it was a vegetarian or non-vegetarian biryani. She contacted 'Biryani House' for the same. The manager at 'Biryani House' apologized and immediately sent a vegetarian biryani along with complimentary sweet dish. Identify and explain the two consumer rights discussed in the above case.

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025Subjective· 4mImportance★★★★★
🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

The case illustrates the Right to Information (violated when the package lacked veg/non-veg marking) and the Right to Redress (exercised when Abha complained and received a replacement plus compensation).

When Abha ordered vegetable biryani and received an unmarked package that turned out to contain non-vegetarian food, two fundamental consumer rights came into play—one was denied at the point of sale, and the other was invoked to set things right.

The Right to Information

Every consumer has the right to be informed about the quality, quantity, potency, purity, standard, and price of goods or services. This right protects buyers from deceptive practices and ensures they can make informed choices. In Abha's case, the packaging from Biryani House carried no indication of whether the biryani was vegetarian or non-vegetarian. This is a clear violation.

Food packaging in India is legally required to display certain information—whether a product is vegetarian or non-vegetarian is mandatory under the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) regulations, typically shown through a green or brown dot. The absence of this marking meant Abha could not verify what she was serving her guests, leading to an embarrassing and potentially serious situation (many people avoid non-vegetarian food for religious, ethical, or health reasons). The Right to Information was breached the moment that package left the restaurant without proper labeling.

Note

The Right to Information is not just about advertising claims—it extends to labels, instructions, warnings, and any detail that affects a consumer's decision or safety.

The Right to Redress

Once Abha discovered the error and contacted Biryani House, she was exercising her Right to Redress—the right to seek compensation or remedy for unfair trade practices, defective goods, or unsatisfactory services. This right ensures that consumers are not left helpless when something goes wrong; they can demand correction, replacement, refund, or compensation. …

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.