(a)(i) Two point charges +q and -q are held at (a, 0) and (-a, 0) in the x-y plane. Obtain an expression for t

Question

+q

(ii) Three point charges of

-2

nC,

-1

nC and

+5

nC are kept at the vertices A, B and C of an equilateral triangle of side

0.2

m. Find the total amount of work done in shifting the charges from A to

A_1

, B to

B_1

and C to

C_1

. Here

A_1

B_1

and

C_1

are the midpoints of sides AB, BC and CA, respectively.

(OR)

(b)(i) State Gauss's law. Using it, derive an expression for the electric field due to a uniformly charged thin spherical shell of radius

r

at a point at a distance

y

from the centre of the shell such that (I)

y > r

, and (II)

y < r

(ii) A point charge of

+2

nC is kept at the origin of a three-dimensional coordinate system. Find the type and magnitude of the charge which should be kept at

(0, 0, -6\,\text{m})

so that the potential due to the system becomes zero at

(0, 0, 2\,\text{m})

CBSECBSE Class XII Board 2025Subjective· 5mImportance★★★★★

🔒 Locked · start free trial →

You're viewing a preview — the full solution, concept, methods & PYQ mapping are locked.

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Part (a)Concept understanding — Coulomb Force Superposition

Coulomb Force Superposition – From Intuition to Precision

Imagine you're in a room with three friends. Each friend can push or pull you. If two friends push you from the same side, you feel a stronger push — the combined effect. If one pushes from the left and another from the right, you feel the net effect, which might be smaller or even zero if they push equally hard.

This is exactly how electric forces work. When multiple charged particles are present, each one exerts its own force on a given charge. The total force that charge feels is simply the vector sum of all the individual forces — as if each other charge were acting alone, completely ignoring the presence of the rest.

That's the core idea: forces add like arrows, not like numbers.

The Precise Statement

\vec{F}_{\text{net on } q_0} = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \vec{F}_{i \to 0} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{q_0 q_i}{r_{i0}^2} \, \hat{r}_{i0}

Where:

$q_0$ is the charge you're calculating the force on
$q_i$ are all other charges (excluding $q_0$ itself)
$r_{i0}$ is the distance between $q_i$ and $q_0$
$\hat{r}_{i0}$ is a unit vector pointing from $q_i$ to $q_0$ (or away, depending on sign convention — be consistent)

The key point: Each pair of charges interacts independently. The presence of a third charge does not alter the force between the first two. This is what "superposition" means — the forces simply layer on top of each other.

Why This Matters (and a Common Trap)

Watch out

Never add the magnitudes of forces directly unless all forces are along the same line and in the same direction. Force is a vector — direction matters.

If two forces point in opposite directions, they partially cancel. If they're at right angles, the net force is found using the Pythagorean theorem, not simple addition.

Example: Three charges on a line:

$q_1 = +2\,\mu\text{C}$ at $x=0$
$q_2 = -1\,\mu\text{C}$ at $x=3\,\text{cm}$
$q_0 = +1\,\mu\text{C}$ at $x=1\,\text{cm}$

Step 1: Force from $q_1$ on $q_0$ — both positive, so repulsive. $q_0$ is pushed to the right.

Step 2: Force from $q_2$ on $q_0$ — opposite signs, so attractive. $q_0$ is pulled to the right (toward $q_2$ ).

Step 3: Both forces point right. Now you add magnitudes: $F_{\text{net}} = F_{1\to0} + F_{2\to0}$ .

If $q_2$ were also positive, the force from $q_2$ would push $q_0$ left, and you'd subtract.

The Deeper Reason

Coulomb's law is a linear law — the force is proportional to each charge individually. If you double $q_1$ , the force from $q_1$ doubles, but the force from $q_2$ stays the same. This linearity is what makes superposition possible. It's not a coincidence — it's a fundamental property of electromagnetic interactions at the classical level.

Important

Superposition works because electric forces obey a linear inverse-square law. If the force depended on products of three charges (like $q_0 q_1 q_2$ ), superposition would fail. It doesn't — and that's why we can break down any multi-charge problem into a series of two-charge calculations.

--- …

Why this formula?

Coulomb Force Superposition — Why the Formula Holds

The principle of superposition for Coulomb forces states that the net electrostatic force on a given charge due to a collection of other charges is the vector sum of the individual forces from each charge, as if the others were absent.

The Key Formula

If we have a charge $q_0$ at position $\vec{r}_0$ , and $N$ other point charges $q_1, q_2, \dots, q_N$ at positions $\vec{r}_1, \vec{r}_2, \dots, \vec{r}_N$ , the net force on $q_0$ is:

\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \frac{q_0 q_i}{|\vec{r}_0 - \vec{r}_i|^2} \, \hat{r}_{0i}

where $\hat{r}_{0i}$ is the unit vector pointing from $q_i$ to $q_0$ .

Why This Works — The Physical Reasoning

1. Coulomb's Law is a Two-Body Interaction

Coulomb's law describes the force between exactly two point charges. It depends only on:

The product of their charges ( $q_0 q_i$ )
The inverse square of the distance between them
The direction along the line joining them

Crucially, the force between $q_0$ and $q_i$ does not depend on the presence of any other charges $q_j$ .

2. Forces Add as Vectors (Newton's Third Law + Linearity)

Electrostatic forces are real physical forces — they obey Newton's laws. If multiple forces act on the same charge, the net effect is the vector sum of each individual force. This is a fundamental property of forces in classical mechanics.

3. The Electric Field is Linear

A deeper reason: the electric field $\vec{E}$ obeys superposition. Since $\vec{F} = q_0 \vec{E}$ , and $\vec{E}$ from multiple sources adds linearly, the force automatically adds linearly.

The electric field at $\vec{r}_0$ due to $q_i$ is:

\vec{E}_i(\vec{r}_0) = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q_i}{|\vec{r}_0 - \vec{r}_i|^2} \, \hat{r}_{0i}

Then:

\vec{F}_{\text{net}} = q_0 \sum_i \vec{E}_i = \sum_i \vec{F}_i

The Crucial Assumption (Why It's Not Trivial)

Superposition holds because Maxwell's equations are linear in the electric field. If the equations were nonlinear (e.g., if the field depended on $E^2$ ), then the force from two charges together would not be the sum of the individual forces.

In electrostatics, the electric field satisfies:

\nabla \cdot \vec{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}, \quad \nabla \times \vec{E} = 0

Both equations are linear — if $\vec{E}_1$ and $\vec{E}_2$ are solutions, then $\vec{E}_1 + \vec{E}_2$ is also a solution. This linearity is the mathematical reason superposition works.

--- …

Part (b)Concept understanding — Gauss Law

Gauss's Law is a shortcut. Instead of adding up the Coulomb contribution of every charge — a nightmare of vectors and integrals — it lets you read the field straight off the symmetry of a problem. The whole idea rests on one quantity: electric flux.

Flux — field-lines counted through a surface. For a uniform field E crossing a flat area A, the flux is Φ = E·A = EA cosθ, where θ is the angle between the field and the normal to the surface. Picture the field as a bundle of lines; flux is how many pierce the surface. When E is edge-on (θ = 90°) nothing passes through and Φ = 0; when E is ⊥ to the surface (θ = 0) the count is maximal. For a closed surface, Φ is the net number of lines leaving it — lines that enter and exit cancel.

The law itself. Gauss's law states that the net flux out of any closed surface depends only on the charge trapped inside:

Φ = q_enclosed / ε₀.

Two consequences do most of the work. First, only enclosed charge counts — a charge outside sends as many lines in as out, so its net contribution is exactly zero. Second, the surface's shape is irrelevant; move the charge around inside or deform the surface, and Φ never changes.

Why symmetry makes it powerful. By itself Φ = q/ε₀ has E buried in an integral. It becomes a tool only when you pick a Gaussian surface matched to the symmetry — one where E is constant and everywhere either ⊥ to the surface (so Φ = EA) or ∥ to it (contributing nothing). Then E slides out and you solve in one line. This works for exactly three geometries:

1 — Infinite line charge (linear density λ). Use a coaxial cylinder: E = λ / 2πε₀r, falling off as ∝ 1/r.

2 — Infinite sheet (surface density σ). Use a pillbox pierced through the sheet: E = σ / 2ε₀ — uniform and completely independent of distance. The field near a large charged plane simply doesn't weaken as you step back. …

Why this formula?

Gauss's Law: Why It Holds

Gauss's Law is one of the four Maxwell's equations and a cornerstone of electromagnetism. Let's build the understanding from the ground up — not just the formula, but the why.

1. The Core Idea: Flux as "Flow" of Field

Imagine an electric field $\vec{E}$ passing through a small patch of area $dA$ . The electric flux through that patch is:

d\Phi_E = \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \, dA \cos\theta

where $\theta$ is the angle between $\vec{E}$ and the outward normal to the surface.

Why this definition?

If $\vec{E}$ is perpendicular to the surface ( $\theta = 0$ ), maximum field "flows through".
If $\vec{E}$ is parallel ( $\theta = 90^\circ$ ), no flux — the field just slides along the surface.

Total flux through a closed surface $S$ is:

\Phi_E = \oint_S \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}

2. The Key Insight: Flux Depends Only on Enclosed Charge

Consider a single point charge $+q$ at the centre of a spherical surface of radius $r$ .

By Coulomb's law, at every point on the sphere: $E = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2}$ , radially outward.
The area vector $d\vec{A}$ is also radially outward.
So $\vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A} = E \, dA$ everywhere.

The total flux:

\Phi_E = \oint E \, dA = E \oint dA = \left( \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \right) (4\pi r^2) = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}

Notice: The $r^2$ cancels! The flux is independent of the radius.

3. Why Shape Doesn't Matter

Now, what if the surface is not spherical but any closed shape enclosing the charge?

Draw a small cone from the charge to the surface.
The flux through a patch $dA$ at distance $r$ is $d\Phi = \frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \frac{q}{r^2} \cos\theta \, dA$ .
But $\frac{\cos\theta \, dA}{r^2}$ is exactly the solid angle $d\Omega$ subtended by $dA$ at the charge.

So $d\Phi = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} d\Omega$ .

Integrating over the entire closed surface: $\oint d\Omega = 4\pi$ (total solid angle around a point).

Hence:

\Phi_E = \frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_0} \cdot 4\pi = \frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}

Result: For any closed surface enclosing $q$ , the flux is $\frac{q}{\varepsilon_0}$ .

4. Multiple Charges: Superposition

If there are many charges $q_1, q_2, \dots, q_n$ inside the surface, the total electric field is the vector sum of individual fields:

\vec{E} = \vec{E}_1 + \vec{E}_2 + \dots + \vec{E}_n

Flux is linear: …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

By superposition the field on the axis $(0,y)$ is $E=\dfrac{2kqa}{(a^2+y^2)^{3/2}}$ toward the $-q$ side, reducing to the dipole field $\dfrac{2kqa}{y^3}$ for $y\gg a$ ; the work to move the three charges to the side-midpoints is $-5.85\times10^{-7}\,\text{J}$ .
Gauss's law gives $E=\dfrac{kQ}{y^2}$ outside a charged shell and $E=0$ inside; a charge of $-8\,\text{nC}$ at $(0,0,-6\,\text{m})$ makes the potential zero at $(0,0,2\,\text{m})$ .

Part (a)

(i) Net field at $(0,y)$ . Charge $+q$ is at $(a,0)$ , $-q$ at $(-a,0)$ , observation point $P=(0,y)$ . Both are at $r=\sqrt{a^2+y^2}$ , so each produces a field of magnitude $E_0=\dfrac{kq}{a^2+y^2}$ .

Resolving along the axes: the vertical ( $y$ ) components of the two fields are equal and opposite and cancel; the horizontal ( $x$ ) components are equal and both point from $P$ toward the negative charge (the $-\hat x$ direction). With $\cos\theta=\dfrac{a}{\sqrt{a^2+y^2}}$ ,

E_{\text{net}}=2E_0\cos\theta=\frac{2kqa}{(a^2+y^2)^{3/2}}\quad(\text{along }-\hat x).

For a far-off point $y\gg a$ , $(a^2+y^2)^{3/2}\to y^3$ , so

E\approx\frac{2kqa}{y^3}=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\frac{p}{y^3},\qquad p=2qa.

This is the equatorial dipole field: it falls off as $1/y^3$ (faster than a point charge) and is antiparallel to the dipole moment $\vec p$ (which points from $-q$ to $+q$ ).

(ii) Work done. Work by an external agent equals the change in potential energy, $W=U_f-U_i$ , with $U=\dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\sum_{\text{pairs}}\dfrac{q_iq_j}{r_{ij}}$ .

Charges: $q_A=-2\,\text{nC},\,q_B=-1\,\text{nC},\,q_C=+5\,\text{nC}$ . The pair products sum to

q_Aq_B+q_Bq_C+q_Cq_A=(2-5-10)\times10^{-18}=-13\times10^{-18}\,\text{C}^2.

Initially every pair separation is $0.2$ m:

U_i=(9\times10^9)\frac{-13\times10^{-18}}{0.2}=-5.85\times10^{-7}\,\text{J}.

After the move the charges sit at the midpoints $A_1,B_1,C_1$ , which form the medial triangle of side $0.2/2=0.1$ m (all three separations $0.1$ m):

U_f=(9\times10^9)\frac{-13\times10^{-18}}{0.1}=-1.17\times10^{-6}\,\text{J}.

$W=U_f-U_i=-1.17\times10^{-6}+5.85\times10^{-7}=-5.85\times10^{-7}\,\text{J}.$ …

Start your 14-day free trial to unlock the full solution →

Same / Similar Concept — real previous-year questions on the same or a closely similar concept, not this exact question.

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 on this concept.

CBSE 2026Set A1 markMCQ
$Q. Coulomb's law is valid for (A) Point charges only (B) Dispersed charges only (C) Both point charges and dispersed charges (D) Neutral particles$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Coulomb's law is defined for point charges; extended bodies need integration.

Coulomb's law states $F = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}$ , where $r$ is the distance between the charges.

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set A1 markMCQ
$Q. S.I. unit of electric flux is (A) Vm (B) Vm^2 (C) Jm (D) NC^-1$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Φ = E·A → (V/m)(m²) = V·m.

Electric flux is $\Phi = \vec{E}\cdot\vec{A}$ .

Unit of electric field $E$ = N/C = V/m (volt per metre).

Unit of area $A$ = m².

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set A1 markMCQ
$Q. The surface charge densities on the surface of two conducting spheres of radii r1 and r2 are equal. The ratio of electric field intensities on the surfaces is (A) r1/r2 (B) r1^2/r2^2 (C) r2^2/r1^2 (D) 1 : 1$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Just outside a charged conductor E = σ/ε₀; with equal σ the fields are equal (1:1).

The electric field just outside the surface of a charged conductor is

$E = \frac{\sigma}{\varepsilon_0},$

which depends only on the local surface charge density σ, not on the radius.

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. Two spheres carrying charges +6 μC and +9 μC, separated by a distance d, experience a force of repulsion F. When a charge of -3 μC is added to each sphere and distance d is kept the same, the new force of repulsion will be$
(a) 3F
(b) F/9
(c) F
(d) F/3
›Reveal solutionSolution

New force = F/3, because force is proportional to the product of the charges and only the charges changed, not the distance.

By Coulomb's law, the force between two point charges $q_1$ and $q_2$ separated by a fixed distance $d$ is

$F = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1 q_2}{d^2}$

Originally $q_1 = +6\ \mu C$ and $q_2 = +9\ \mu C$ , so $F \propto q_1 q_2 = 54$ (in $\mu C^2$ ).

After $-3\ \mu C$ is added to each sphere: …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. Electric flux is a$
(a) scalar quantity
(b) vector quantity
(c) scalar or vector quantity
(d) constant quantity
›Reveal solutionSolution

Electric flux is a scalar quantity, even though it is defined using two vectors.

Electric flux through a surface is defined as

$\Phi = \oint \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A}$

Although $\vec{E}$ (electric field) and $d\vec{A}$ (area vector, normal to the surface element) are both vectors, their dot product $\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A} = E\,dA\cos\theta$ is a single number (magnitude only, with a sign depending on $\theta$ ) — it …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. Two sphere of charge 2μc and 3μc are located at a distance 20 cm apart in air. The ratio of magnitude of electric forces acting between these spheres will be$
(a) 1 : 1
(b) 2 : 3
(c) 3 : 2
(d) 4 : 9
›Reveal solutionSolution

The mutual electric force between two charges is an action-reaction pair, so both spheres feel equal magnitude forces regardless of the charge values.

By Coulomb's law the force sphere 1 exerts on sphere 2 has magnitude F = k q1 q2 / r^2, and the force sphere 2 exerts on sphere 1 has the same magnitude k q1 q2 / r^2, just opposite in direction (Newton's third law applies to electrostatic forces just as it do …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$Q. A charge Q, is enclosed by a Gaussian spherical surface of radius R. If the radius is doubled, then the outward electric flux will$
(a) decrease to half
(b) increase two times
(c) remain unchanged
(d) increase four times
›Reveal solutionSolution

Gauss's law: flux through any closed surface = Q_enclosed / epsilon_0, and this does NOT depend on the surface's size or shape.

Gauss's law states that for any closed (Gaussian) surface,

flux (phi) = Q_enclosed / epsilon_0

Here the same charge Q sits at the centre of the sphere both before and after the radius is doubled - the enclosed charge Q_enclosed is unchanged. Since flux depends ONLY on Q_enclosed and the permittivity of free space epsilon_0 (both unchanged here), the flux does not change even though the surface area (4piR^2) has increased fourfold. Doubling R spreads the same total flux over 4 ti …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 markMCQ
$R$
(a) increases as $r$ increases for $r<R$ and for $r>R$
(b) is zero as $r$ increases for $r<R$ and decreases as $r$ increases for $r>R$
(c) is zero as $r$ increases for $r<R$ and increases as $r$ increases for $r>R$
(d) decreases as $r$ increases for $r<R$ and for $r>R$
›Reveal solutionSolution

A charged conducting (hollow metal) sphere carries all its charge on the outer surface. Gauss's law gives $E=0$ inside and $E\propto 1/r^2$ (decreasing) outside.

Setting up Gauss's law

For a hollow, uniformly charged conducting sphere of radius $R$ and total charge $Q$ , all the charge resides on the outer surface (a fundamental property of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium — free charges repel each other and move to the surface where the electric field inside the conducting material is zero).

Take a concentric spherical Gaussian surface of radius $r$ .

Case 1: $r<R$ (inside the shell)

The Gaussian surface of radius $r$ encloses no charge, because all the charge $Q$ lies on the surface at radius $R>r$ .

$\oint \vec E\cdot d\vec A = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0} = 0 \implies E=0$

This is true for every $r<R$ — the field is zero throughout the interior, it does not "increase" or "decrease," it is simply zero.

Case 2: $r>R$ (outside the shell)

Now the Gaussian surface encloses the entire charge $Q$ . By spherical symmetry, $\vec E$ is radial and has the same magnitude everywhere on the Gaussian sphere, so

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2026Set ANNUAL1 mark
$Q. Match the Column A with Column B and write the correct pair. Column A: Electric flux. Column B:$
(i) μ₀nI,
(ii) Volt × second,
(iii) μ₀nI/2,
(iv) Volt × meter,
(v) Volt × meter⁻¹,
(vi) Volt.
›Reveal solutionSolution

Electric flux φ_E = E·A; unit = (V/m)(m²) = V·m, option (iv).

Electric flux through a surface is φ_E = E·A (for a uniform field perpendicular to area A). The SI unit of electric field E is volt per metre (V/m) = N/C, and area is in m². Therefore the unit of electric flux is

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set X11 markMCQ
$q_1$
(a) increases
(b) decreases
(c) may increase or decrease
(d) does not change
›Reveal solutionSolution

(d) does not change. By the principle of superposition, the electrostatic force between $q_1$ and $q_2$ is given by Coulomb's law $F = \dfrac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\dfrac{q_1 q_2}{r^2}$ and depends …

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set D1 markMCQ
$Q. Gauss's law states that the electric flux through a closed surface is (A) proportional to the charge enclosed (B) inversely proportional to the charge enclosed (C) zero (D) proportional to the square of the charge enclosed$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Gauss's law states the total electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge divided by ε₀, so Φ ∝ q_enclosed.

Gauss's law is written as

$\oint \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0}$

The left side is the total electric flux Φ through the closed (Gaussian) surface. Thus

$\Phi = \frac{q_{enc}}{\varepsilon_0}$

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →
CBSE 2025Set D1 markMCQ
$Q. The distance between two charges is made half and one of the charges is also halved. The force acting between the two will become as compared to previous value (A) half (B) double (C) thrice (D) none of these$
›Reveal solutionSolution

Coulomb force F ∝ q₁q₂/r²; halving one charge (×½) and halving the distance (×4) gives a net factor of 2, so the force doubles.

Coulomb's law:

$F = \frac{k q_1 q_2}{r^2}$

Initial force: $F = \dfrac{k q_1 q_2}{r^2}$ .

Now one charge becomes $q_1/2$ and the distance becomes $r/2$ :

…

Start your 14-day free trial to see the full solution →

Q.(a)(i) Two point charges +q+q+q and −q-q−q are held at (a,0)(a, 0)(a,0) and (−a,0)(-a, 0)(−a,0) in the x-y plane. Obtain an expression for the net electric field due to the charges at a point (0,y)(0, y)(0,y). Hence, find the electric field at a far-off point (y≫a)(y \gg a)(y≫a).

Part (a)

🎓Unlock everything free for 14 days

Q.(a)(i) Two point charges $+q$ and $-q$ are held at $(a, 0)$ and $(-a, 0)$ in the x-y plane. Obtain an expression for the net electric field due to the charges at a point $(0, y)$ . Hence, find the electric field at a far-off point $(y \gg a)$ .

Unlock everything free for 14 days