Skip to content
Very Short Answer Questions · Q1

Q.Explain the statement: Test cross is a back cross, but a back cross is not necessarily a test cross.

Maharashtra MsbshseTextbookSubjectiveImportance★★★★★
12% · 10/84 Questions
✓ Free question

A test cross always uses the recessive parent, so it is always a back cross; but a back cross against the dominant parent is not a test cross.

Step 1. A back cross is defined broadly: it is any cross of an F1 hybrid with either of its two original parents, dominant or recessive.

Step 2. A test cross is defined more narrowly: it is specifically the cross of the F1 hybrid with the homozygous recessive parent, done to reveal whether the F1 is homozygous or heterozygous.

Step 3. Since the test cross's tester is always the recessive parent, every test cross automatically satisfies the definition of a back cross. But a back cross performed against the dominant parent does not reveal the F1's genotype in the same diagnostic way, so it is a back cross without being a test cross.

✓Final answer

Every test cross qualifies as a back cross, but not every back cross qualifies as a test cross.

Unlock everything free for 14 days

  • Full step-by-step solutions
  • Concept-first explanations
  • Methods, shortcuts & mistakes
  • PYQ mapping + timed mock tests

Full access for 14 days. No credit card required.